Thursday, July 29, 2010

US military deaths in Afghan region at 1,122 - Forbes.com

US military deaths in Afghan region at 1,122 - Forbes.com

As of Thursday, July 29, 2010, at least 1,122 members of the U.S. military had died in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan as a result of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in late 2001, according to an Associated Press count.

At least 890 military personnel have died in Afghanistan as a result of hostile action, according to the military's numbers. The Defense Department's tally was last updated Friday at 10 a.m. EDT.

Contractors, Afghan recruits in deadly training dispute - Washington Times

Contractors, Afghan recruits in deadly training dispute - Washington Times

CAMP SPANN, Afghanistan | A training exercise this month erupted into a deadly gunfight between Afghan and U.S. instructors, illustrating the problems officials face in preparing the Afghan soldiers and police officers for the drawdown of U.S. troops next year.

What's more, the July 20 incident at the Regional Mass Training Center at Camp Shaheen, about 10 miles east of Mazar-e Sharif, was the second fatal shooting this month of Westerners by their Afghan counterparts.

According to Afghan armyLt. Col. Mohammed Naem, the media officer at Camp Shaheen, Afghan army recruits were participating in a training exercise when an argument erupted between an Afghan enlisted man named Jafar and a U.S. contractor who worked for Military Professional Resources Inc. (MPRI).

The men were skilled weapons trainers and friends, said Col. Naem, who works frequently with NATO public affairs personnel.

"The MPRI guy raised his fist and was yelling obscenities at [Jafar]," he said. "Jafar steps back, and his sidearm ... accidentally falls to the ground."

A U.S. soldier standing nearby witnessed the quarrel and, thinking Jafar was reaching for his pistol to harm the MPRI instructor, "unloads a magazine" into Jafar, killing him and wounding another, Col. Naem said.

An Afghan recruit saw the U.S. soldier shoot Jafar and, in retaliation, shot the soldier and another MPRI contractor, the media officer said. Other trainees rushed to the area and, seeing the Afghan recruit standing amid the carnage, drew their weapons and opened fire, killing the recruit.

In the end, two American contractors and two Afghans were killed, and one U.S. soldier and one Afghan were wounded.

Leaked documents detail attacks by Turkish militants – This Just In - CNN.com Blogs

Leaked documents detail attacks by Turkish militants – This Just In - CNN.com Blogs

U.S. forces stationed near the Afghan-Pakistani border were subject to repeated attacks from Turkish militants in 2007, according to reports included among the tens of thousands of American military documents leaked this week.

Turkey, a NATO ally, has contributed peacekeepers to Afghanistan, but the documents describe attacks on NATO positions at or around Forward Operating Base Bermel. The attacks listed in these documents all failed, and in many cases the insurgents gave away their plans or position to the U.S. military because of insecure radio communications.

The reports were among the massive cache of U.S. military documents on the war in Afghanistan published by the online whistleblower site WikiLeaks earlier this week. The Turkish Embassy in Washington did not respond to CNN's request for comment.

CNN Senior Pentagon Producer Mike Mount was at FOB Bermel, a post near the rugged frontier with Pakistan, from September to October of 2006. Mount was present during several insurgent rocket attacks on the base, including two in which a rocket landed on the base grounds.

In one, the rocket hit a dirt barrier near a cannon, sending shrapnel near an observation post and wounding a soldier. During a separate incident, Mount says a rocket hit an unoccupied space of the base, sending shrapnel throughout the base, hitting the plywood living quarters and shower facilities where Mount and CNN's team were staying. There were no injuries during the second incident, because everyone had taken cover in a bunker. But military officials told Mount that Turkish insurgents were responsible for the attacks.

"For a number of weeks, they had picked up intelligence that there were Turkish insurgents firing these rockets at the base," Mount said. "They picked up on their communications that they were Turkish fighters and they were having trouble isolating them, finding them when they were firing the rockets, because they were putting the rockets on timers and hiding in ravines to give themselves plenty of time to escape before the rockets fired at the base." The 2006 incidents that Mount experienced do not appear in any of the WikiLeaks documents reviewed by CNN.

A few days before Mount and his CNN team left, the base commander told them that they had killed two Turkish insurgents believed to be responsible for firing the rockets at the base, but the documents published by WikiLeaks show that the rocket attacks continued in 2007.

The first documented attack took place in May of 2007. "Todays (sic) single rocket was the first involvement of Turkish fighters in directly attacking [coalition forces]," after spending about two weeks observing coalition forces and how they responded to ambushes, an unidentified analyst wrote. U.S. forces did not suffer any casualties or damages during this incident.

Less than a week later, Turkish fighters attempted a second attack on FOB Bermel, firing two rockets from a different position. An analyst speculated that the intent of the attack was to get a better sense of the range of fire for their weapons. "The Turkish fighters appeared to use this indirect fire incident to gather knowledge on range from a previously unused [Point of Origin]," the report says.

The Turkish fighters stepped up their efforts in July of that year, attempting to ambush two platoons returning to FOB Bermel from a patrol. There were no American casualties, but the commander assessed that "it was most likely initiated by Turkish fighters." He also said, "The ambush fire was accurate and the [exfiltration] by the enemy was disciplined."

And they tried again in September, when four rockets were launched at a company of U.S. forces stationed at the Malekshay Combat Outpost near FOB Bermel. The document indicated that U.S. forces overheard communications throughout the day indicating that "Turkish fighters were preparing to fire rockets at the [Combat Outpost]." The four rockets missed their target, but the U.S. forces were able to pick up on insurgent communications to track the location of Turkish observers.

The insurgents began fleeing toward the border to cross into Pakistan. According to the record, the company notified Pakistani military officials that insurgents had fired rockets at them and were heading for the border. They also warned that they would be firing artillery shells in that general area, and suggested that the Pakistanis take cover. A total of ten shots were fired from FOB Bermel and the company. After repeated attempts to contact Pakistani military, the company received a message from them which only said, "Please wait."

Twenty minutes after the rounds were fired, the company picked up communications chatter indicating the rounds had hit their intended target. The gist of that chatter: "Nasrat, do you hear me? I hear somebody is injured. You don't hear anything else but this voice. This means everybody is hurt. (W)hen we arrive we can tell you the story." The name Nasrat appears several times in the documents. In one report dated October 2007, he is described as "a Taliban commander overseeing Turkish foreign fighters repeatedly involved in initiating attacks against Task Force Eagle forces in southern Bermel district." The same report indicates he has been under communications surveillance for some time. "TF Eagle has monitored Nasrat on numerous [signals intelligence] gists since July involving attacks on coalition forces."

In October of 2007, radio transmissions gave away the position of a group of at least 14 Turkish insurgents to U.S. forces. A Predator drone confirmed their location, and two A-10 attack jets were deployed after the insurgents were "declared imminent threat," according to the document. The jets dropped a bomb on the fighters, and continued their assault with rockets, bombs, and chain guns. A patrol sent to the site an hour later found a blood trail, part of a head, six dead bodies, and a wounded insurgent. The report also notes that based on the blood trails at the scene, an estimated 15 to 20 Turkish fighters were suspected to have been injured or killed.

A few days later, U.S. forces at FOB Bermel picked up Turkish chatter saying, "Brother, we are leaving. It's got 15 minutes on it." After that time period elapsed, the base was attacked by three rockets, all of which missed their intended target. There were no U.S. casualties in this attack, and subsequent Turkish chatter was picked up indicating their acknowledgement that the rockets had missed. But the insurgents would suffer their biggest loss a month later.

U.S. forces picked up communications indicating there were plans to attack Malekshay Combat Outpost from two different positions. The local company commander devised a fire response to complement mortar and artillery rounds that would be fired from nearby U.S. bases against the insurgents. Once the firefight began, more than 40 insurgents were observed to "wildly flee the area after indirect and direct fire began." F-15 and A-10 jets and AH-64 Apache helicopter gunships were called in to the area to bomb and strafe the insurgents. The report from the incident says that after the final smart bomb was dropped, U.S. forces picked up insurgent chatter saying, "We are lost." "My friend was taking me to Afghanistan," the report quoted one of the insurgents as saying. "Only two of us are left. I don't know where we could go. Now the other guy is lost. We are separated. I am disappointed we could not fight back."

The post-action report indicated that 30 insurgents were killed and an additional five were wounded. An intelligence source cited in the document said that two of the dead were Turkish fighters. The final reference to Turkish insurgents in the WikiLeaks documents is from November 2009, when a security patrol came under fire. When the patrol went to the compound to investigate the source of the fire, they found a dead body and an undisclosed amount of Turkish money among the weapons and supplies that had been left behind by the insurgents.

Sen. Fritz Hollings: The Bottom Line in Afghanistan

Sen. Fritz Hollings: The Bottom Line in Afghanistan

At last! The best excuse for the mistaken "war" in Afghanistan is "nation building." Rick Stengel, editor of Time, finally identified nation building as the strategy or goal this morning on Morning Joe. Defending Time's cover article of the wonderful rights given some women in Afghanistan during the past nine years and insisting that we couldn't leave now for fear that they would go back to selling their daughters, Stengel gave approval to the policy of nation building or force feeding democracy in Afghanistan. This morning's argument never got to the bottom line question: "Can you ask GIs to give their lives for nation building?" My answer is no. When we failed to commit the troops in August of 2004, I stated in the United States Senate that the effort in Afghanistan was no longer worth the life of an additional GI. And we ought to get out. President Eisenhower noted that democracy was not a hundred yard dash but an endurance contest. Bottom line: We can't ask GIs to get killed as we endure for democracy in Afghanistan.
After nine years the counterinsurgency strategy or nation building strategy is for a Marine not to instantly return fire coming from a row of houses as he moves forward. He is supposed to stop and call headquarters to get permission to return fire -- all the time praying that he doesn't get killed while headquarters makes up its mind. GIs and Marines are taught for war -- to continue going forward under fire. We're killing less civilians, but more GIs, under this strategy. But we're ruining our armed forces. Killing is the policy of the Pentagon. Bottom line -- we shouldn't change Dale Carnegie's field manual of "lavishing praise" to make friends to "getting killed" to make friends.
Stengel assumes that Afghanistan is now a democracy, and extending women's rights for a few more years will stabilize the country. We've already given up the North. We've already given up trying to change most of the warlords, and are only nation building in the populace South. We could stay in Afghanistan ten more years, giving women their rights, and the warlords and culture would immediately take over when we left. We can't understand that we're trying to change a culture in Afghanistan. I learned sixty-seven years ago liberating Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia that there are ideas more valued in the Muslim world than freedom and democracy. After sixty-seven years, Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia have yet to opt for democracy. Nor have any of the other Muslim countries. The only exception, Turkey, is constantly having its democracy restored by the military. Bottom line: You can't ask GIs to die to force feed democracy; you can't ask GIs to get killed to force feed a cultural change.
Everything in Afghanistan is corrupt. The election was corrupt, the President is corrupt, the warlords are corrupt, the Taliban is corrupt, and we are corrupt. We've had Karzai's brother, a warlord in Kandahar on the CIA payroll, and we still bribe to get our convoys through. Bottom line: You can't ask GIs to get killed waiting for Afghanistan to go honest.
General Petraeus can write all the books on counterinsurgency he wants, but for counterinsurgency to work it takes time, money and casualties. The United States will take the time; the United States will borrow the money, but the United States will not take the casualties to make counterinsurgency work. Nor should we. I can see the thousands of Chinese spilling over the Yalu River in the Korean War. We withdrew to the 38th Parallel where we could take the casualties and get a peace agreement. After ten years in Vietnam, we proved that more were willing to die for communism than were willing to die for democracy. We killed more Vietnamese than we suffered casualties, but we properly withdrew. I have been to Hanoi and the people are happy. I saw the lake where John McCain landed, his old French prison, and that evening I walked around the streets unescorted, unprotected, which I wouldn't dare do in parts of Washington, D. C. We can't get it through our heads that there is a better way to influence people than employing the military to spread freedom and democracy. Spreading democracy in Afghanistan, we have created as much terrorism and as many terrorists as we have eliminated. The build and destroy policy in Vietnam changed in Afghanistan to kill and make friends. We now call it counterinsurgency. Bottom line: We are not willing to take, and we shouldn't be willing to take, the casualties necessary for counterinsurgency to work in Afghanistan.
We are now arguing about whether a certain date next year for withdrawal was a good strategy or not. It doesn't make any difference. Earlier this year we withdrew from a valley that we had been trying to take for five years. The Taliban took over. The Taliban had victory. The United States wasn't willing to take the necessary casualties for victory. So the Taliban already knew, as they have known each day, that they were willing to take more casualties than the United States. After all, they were fighting for their country, and we were fighting for a country thousands of miles away. We learned in Charlie Wilson's war that Afghans do not like foreigners and were willing to fight to the last man against foreigners in their country. Bottom line: There's no education in the second kick of a mule.

Read more commentary by Senator Hollings at www.citizensforacompetitiveamerica.com.

Gates says war documents leak dangerous to troops, allies

Gates says war documents leak dangerous to troops, allies

WASHINGTON, July 29 (Xinhua) -- U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Thursday said the leaking of over 90,000 classified documents in website Wikileaks is "dangerous to troops" stationed in Afghanistan, and promised an aggressive investigation.

Speaking to reporters at a Pentagon briefing, Gates said the leak could be dangerous for the United States and its allies in Afghanistan.

"The battlefield consequences of the release of these documents are potentially severe and dangerous for our troops, our allies, and Afghan partners," he said.

The leak involved reports written by U.S. soldiers and intelligence officers in Afghanistan mainly describing lethal military actions involving the U.S. military. Put together, they amount to a blow-by-blow account of the war over the last six years, which has so far cost the lives of more than 1,000 U.S. troops. But they also contain identities of some Afghans who have given information to U.S. forces.

Pentagon spokesman David Lapan said Wednesday that the department is reviewing the files, and the naming of individuals could put them in harm's way, or dampen their willingness to work with the United States or Afghan government.

Gates also warned the leak "may well damage our relationships and reputation in that key part of the world," as Afghans and others may no longer trust the United States to keep their secrets safe.

On WikiLeaks scandal, hacker says he didn't want to be a 'coward' - CNN.com

On WikiLeaks scandal, hacker says he didn't want to be a 'coward' - CNN.com

(CNN) -- A California hacker said he doesn't regret going to federal officials to show them alleged confessions an Army private made about leaking more than 90,000 documents that reveal secret information about U.S. war strategy.
Adrian Lamo spoke to CNN from the Sacramento Public Library, where he was trying to get away from reporters and a throng of people who, he said, are angry with him. He says he has received death threats in person and on his Facebook page and Twitter messages from people who feel like he betrayed Pfc. Bradley Manning.
"I went to the right authorities, because it seemed incomprehensible that someone could leak that massive amount of data and not have it endanger human life," Lamo said. "If I had acted for my own comfort and convenience and sat on my hands with that information, and I had endangered national security ... I would have been the worst kind of coward."
Manning, a 22-year-old intelligence analyst based near Baghdad, Iraq, had top-secret security clearance to sensitive information about the war, officials have said. The U.S. military is holding Manning in a Kuwait jail, suspected in the leak of a helicopter gunship attack video from Iraq.
Military investigators also suspect he accessed a military classified internet and e-mail system to download tens of thousands of documents, according to a Pentagon official who did not want to be identified because of the ongoing criminal investigation of the soldier. The whistle-blower website WikiLeaks.org posted more than 75,000 secret military documents on Sunday.
Manning has been charged with eight violations of the U.S. Criminal Code, including allegedly illegally transferring classified data.
If I had acted for my own comfort ... I would have been the worst kind of coward.
--Adrian Lamo
The Army is considering whether Manning should face the military equivalent of a trial over the charges. He has not yet entered a plea, since there has not been a decision about whether he should face trial, Army Maj. Bryan Woods told CNN. Military lawyers for Manning referred CNN questions about him to Woods.
Lamo said he strongly suspects that Manning did not act alone.
"As far as I know, he conducted the database himself but got technical assistance from another source," Lamo said. "[Manning] was aware of one other person in military engaged in accessing databases without authorization."
Lamo refused to elaborate on why he believed this.

Video: Pentagon has 'main suspect' in leak


A superstar in the hacking world, Lamo was convicted in 2004 on one count of computer crimes after breaking into the New York Times, Microsoft and Lexis-Nexis computer systems. Lamo has also reportedly breached Excite@Home's company network and broken into the internal networks of Yahoo! and MCI WorldCom. Wired magazine wrote that after Lamo would crack their security, he would tell the companies about their vulnerabilities, free of charge.
Lamo's boyish, soft mug makes him look a decade younger than his 29 years. A Wired magazine profile this year focused on his struggles with Asperger's Syndrome, a high-functioning form of autism.
Lamo gave the full transcipts of his purported instant message chats with Manning to Wired magazine. It's unclear whether they have been edited.
Lamo declined to provide CNN with the complete instant message logs, citing three reasons. He said they contain personal information he doesn't want exposed, the messages contain information that could compromise national security, and, simply, he doesn't have them all anymore.
"I gave my hard drive to the Department of Defense," he said.
Lamo said he isn't sure why Manning would have reached out to him on the Web. He theorizes that Manning might have seen the Wired profile and recognized a nerdy, kindred spirit.
According to Wired, the messenger suspected to be Manning introduces himself to Lamo by saying, "I'm an army intelligence analyst, deployed to eastern baghdad, pending discharge for 'adjustment disorder.' "
Manning allegedly goes on to say that he feels "isolated." His messages explain in detail his disillusionment with the way the U.S. was waging the Afghan war.
The person alleged to be Manning wrote to Lamo: "i dont believe in good guys versus bad guys anymore... i only a plethora of states acting in self interest... with varying ethics and moral standards of course, but self-interest nonetheless "
According to Wired, on May 22, Manning told Lamo that he had provided WikiLeaks with 260,000 classified State Department diplomatic cables.
Lamo also told Salon in an interview that he had told Manning he was an ordained minister. He said he could treat Manning's talk as a confession.
In another chat, the person believed to be Manning writes about Julian Assange, the head of WikiLeaks.
The message reads: "im a source, not quite a volunteer ...i mean, im a high profile source... and i've developed a relationship with assange... but i dont know much more than what he tells me, which is very little"
Lamo said he thinks Manning was flattered.
"[He] was made to feel important with his ongoing contact with Assange and special link to WikiLeaks, jumping ahead in the queue of people who were also leaking," Lamo claimed.
According to the a version of the chats published in the Washington Post, the messenger believed to be Manning seems despondent, lonely and frustrated. Manning allegedly wrote: "my family is non-supportive . . . im losing my job . . . losing my career options . . . i dont have much more except for this laptop, some books, and a hell of a story."
Manning also is thought to have written: "i mean, i was never noticed ...regularly ignored... except when i had something essential... then it was back to "bring me coffee, then sweep the floor...i never quite understood that...felt like i was an abused work horse..."
Lamo said he felt sympathy for Manning, calling him a "genuine, nice boy."
"He struck me as someone who was easily led," Lamo said. "And I think others took advantage of that idealism and naïvete."
When Lamo was Manning's age, he was in trouble for hacking, scared of facing years in prison.
"I got the same chance to reinvent myself that I hope Bradley Manning gets," Lamo said, adding that he hoped the world would see Manning one day and not immediately think about the WikiLeaks fiasco.
Lamo said he's ready to testify in court if that's necessary.
"I'm not going to run out on this process," he said. "I know what Mr. Manning did, and actions have consequences. Mine do. His do. I've accepted mine, and in time, he will accept his."
Adrian Lamo
Adrian LamoBorn: Feb-1981 [1]
Birthplace: Boston, MA
Gender: Male
Race or Ethnicity: White
Sexual orientation: Bisexual
Occupation: Hacker
Nationality: United States
Executive summary: So-called homeless hacker

[1] Some sources claim that Lamo was born on February 20th, a date which he has neither confirmed nor denied.
Father: Mario Lamo
Mother: Mary Atwood
Wife: Lauren (m. 6-Sep-2007)

High School: (dropped out, GED)
University:
American River College
Hacking pled guilty to federal charges (8-Jan-2004)
Institutionalized Woodland Memorial Hospital, Woodland, CA (Apr-2010)
Risk Factors: Depression

Is this an argument for continued engagement?

Afghan women and the Taliban






Our cover image this week is powerful, shocking and disturbing. It is a portrait of Aisha, a shy 18-year-old Afghan woman who was sentenced by a Taliban commander to have her nose and ears cut off for fleeing her abusive in-laws. Aisha posed for the picture and says she wants the world to see the effect a Taliban resurgence would have on the women of Afghanistan, many of whom have flourished in the past few years. Her picture is accompanied by a powerful story by our own Aryn Baker on how Afghan women have embraced the freedoms that have come from the defeat of the Taliban — and how they fear a Taliban revival.




Aryn Baker is Time's bureau chief for Pakistan and Afghanistan. Previously she was the associate editor at the Asian edition of Time Magazine, based in Hong Kong. Since joining Time in 2001, she has worked as a reporter, editor and correspondent, covering everything from the first Tibetan beauty pageant to Iran’s Paralympics volleyball team, Afghanistan’s first female Olympian and Pakistan's polio eradication program. Prior to moving to Asia, Baker earned her M.A. in Journalism at the University of California, Berkeley, where her focus was on radio and international reporting. While in the United States she wrote freelance articles for the San Jose Mercury News, the Los Angeles Times, the East Bay Express, the Asia Wall Street Journal and the Village Voice. She also produced a weekly news radio program for KALX in Berkeley, and interned at KQED in San Francisco. Journalism is a second career for Baker, who worked as a pastry chef in Paris for several years after earning a B.A. in Anthropology at Sarah Lawrence College.